Discussion @ 1940. Not So Simple Years @ Timus Online Judge

Show all threads Hide all threads Show all messages Hide all messages
useful test	Mortus	1940. Not So Simple Years	4 Nov 2023 02:12	1
useful test Mortus 4 Nov 2023 02:12 1000000000 1000000000 300 answer: 97395891
'2' is not a prime number for this problem	TommyTT	1940. Not So Simple Years	4 Aug 2014 17:31	1
'2' is not a prime number for this problem TommyTT 4 Aug 2014 17:31 Be careful!
WA#3	Ade (FDU)	1940. Not So Simple Years	15 Jun 2014 12:56	4
WA#3 Ade (FDU) 13 Nov 2012 18:23 I'm using inclu-exclu. Start from B and then add and minus. But always WA#3. Any hints? Thansk, Ade Re: WA#3 Ade (FDU) 21 Nov 2012 22:21 Oops. I exclu. the primes. input 3 4 6 Re: WA#3 OncescuCostin 27 Nov 2012 15:54 For this input what is the answer?And can you eplain me.I want to be sure that i understood correctly the task. Re: WA#3 ibra (TNU) 15 Jun 2014 12:56 the answer is 2
spelling 'consiquently' ===> 'consequently'	DR. Zhihua Lai	1940. Not So Simple Years	4 Jan 2013 00:21	2
spelling 'consiquently' ===> 'consequently' DR. Zhihua Lai 3 Jan 2013 22:36 Fixed (-) Sandro (USU) 4 Jan 2013 00:21
Take the A+B into account?	Ade (FDU)	1940. Not So Simple Years	10 Nov 2012 16:25	1
Take the A+B into account? Ade (FDU) 10 Nov 2012 16:25 The the example, is (23+7 == 3) taken into account? Thanks // Oh. I saw the "Hint" ... Edited by author 10.11.2012 16:29 Edited by author 10.11.2012 16:29

Style: flat | tree | nested
Thread Order: bubble | fixed

Discussion of Problem 1940. Not So Simple Years