|
|
| Show all threads Hide all threads Show all messages Hide all messages | | Runtime error in test 12 | Gorbatykh Michail | 1453. Queen | 14 Mar 2016 02:14 | 1 | I don't understand, where I made a mistake, but program crushes there everytime, although in my compilator it is works
Edited by author 15.03.2016 01:56 | | WA on test#13 . Can someone help ^ ... ^ | wanggp3 | 1453. Queen | 30 Jul 2014 00:00 | 1 | | | output size??? | Igor Mihajlovic | 1453. Queen | 11 Dec 2013 21:18 | 2 | what is the limit for output size
it could be very big for n=10000 and s=100000 and if the coordinates is in center of hypercube then there is (s-1)*2^(n-1) by bishop and n*(s-1) by rock squares that queen can move
how the hell should i output this??
or am i wrong???
plz help ASAP!!!
Edited by author 21.08.2008 07:36
Edited by author 21.08.2008 07:36 you can use BigInteger class in java, which calculates the numbers of any sizes... | | test for WA#5 and WA#10 | hoan | 1453. Queen | 5 Jan 2011 18:26 | 1 | test1: (for WA#5)
input:
1 2
output:
1
test2: (for (WA#10)
input:
21 21
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
output:
20971940
hope can help you! | | After Queen 2 it's easy =) | quick(YarSU) | 1453. Queen | 21 Jul 2010 19:09 | 1 | | | Why WA #5 | Dimke | 1453. Queen | 25 Aug 2008 12:59 | 4 | Anyone knows where I can find the tests to this problem? I get WA #5. I don't remember exactly, but in this test N=1 or N=2 It's because this test case probably has only one dimension, so moving like a bishop counts the same fields as moving like a rook. | | Why WA #4 | RA | 1453. Queen | 25 Aug 2008 12:58 | 6 | It's only simple formula and I think it's correct! Re: Why WA #4 ACM.Tolstobrov_Anatoliy[Ivanovo SPU] 22 Apr 2006 17:09
I know when formula simple
BUT N=10000 And S=100000
It Cool?
Somebody can help avoid TLE. i made 2 completely different programs and both times i got WA #5, can any1 tell me why ? Same here can someone tell me what is wrong with that test, i have one version of program that goes to the test 4, then i made some corections and take it to test 8, I corect it again, I am sure that everything is working, but again WA test 4, pls help this is important... | | WA on test 10 | niktrk | 1453. Queen | 24 May 2008 17:13 | 5 | What is so special about this test? If someone have idea for this test post here
Edited by author 07.05.2008 14:52 Same problem here.
I have solution in O(N*S), and it seems ok, but i still get WA#10. Any help would be appreciated, at least idea what could be so diferent in this test.
have a nice day Generate large input data, and see what the output is. | | Special Case | Stefan | 1453. Queen | 20 May 2008 16:14 | 2 | when dimension=1 and length=x result is x-1!
Does anyone know any other special c.? Not really... That's the only one where you mustn't take bishop's movement into account, because it covers the same fields the rook does. |
|
|
|
