| ENG RUS | Timus Online Judge |
Discussion of Problem 1558. Periodical NumbersTiger WA on test #23! Please Help!. [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 3 Nov 2007 09:54 Nodirbek Islomov Re: WA on test #23! Please Help!. // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 17 Jun 2015 17:42 I have WA#23 too :) zzyzzy12 WA31 why? [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 18 Aug 2013 15:01 some trick? zzyzzy12 Re: WA31 why? // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 18 Aug 2013 15:17 ok...Im AC now...if u wa , u can try this data (13681872) (95650177) ans=(50093320)49 scythe If you have wa 37 try with this // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 14 Feb 2012 02:05 (000010000) (000010002) ----------- (000020002) Carbon WA13 [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 12 Jun 2008 15:53 What does this test look like? Vassenbaher [IU7.BMSTU] Re: WA13 // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2010 02:59 Probably like this: (49937) (92484) ----------- (24242)1 A. Babenko, A. Mansurov Kyr-Rus Slav U (0)+(0)=(0) or 0? [2] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 16:22 (0)+(0)=(0) or 0? Vedernikoff Sergey Re: (0)+(0)=(0) or 0? [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 18:41 There is always period, so the answer is (0) Edited by author 22.09.2007 19:17 Denis Koshman Re: (0)+(0)=(0) or 0? // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 15 Jul 2008 03:58 And that happens to be test 34. I had CRASH there as I've put a trap on such case before submission. Lucky me :) Eventually, removing that trap gave me AC. So just treat 0 like any other digit, do not care about leading zeroes. RockWell team Clarification [9] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 13:56 Can be such answer 1(065)064? and what answer for (123) (911) ? victor_sch Re: Clarification [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 14:10 (035) RockWell team Re: Clarification // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 14:19 But why not (035)034? Edited by author 22.09.2007 14:22 HybridTheory Re: Clarification [6] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 14:23 I think it should be (503)4, but i'm not sure, i want to know the answer too victor_sch Re: Clarification [5] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 14:45 (123) + (911) 1034 but on 1034 ++++++++++1034 +++++++++++++1034 > ++++++++03503503 ++++++++++(035) Is it right ? Edited by author 22.09.2007 14:47 RockWell team Re: Clarification [4] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 15:16 (123) + (911) ++++035035035035034 Answer (503)4 AlMag Re: Clarification [3] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 15:41 I have 1(035)034. may I misunderstood the task. 1 034 1 035 034 1 035 035 034 1 035 035 035 034 so, why not that? 1(035)034 or (035)034 or (350)34? Edited by author 22.09.2007 15:44 Megas Re: Clarification [2] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 16:10 The output must have one line containing desired number itself. It must be printed in the representation with minimal period length. Among such representations the one having the least unperiodical part's length must be chosen. Samsonov Ivan (Rybinsk SAAT) Re: Clarification [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 23 Sep 2007 19:03 my AC program give answer (503)4. Denis Koshman Re: Clarification // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 15 Jul 2008 03:55 How do you get that 1034 or 1035? This 1 is CARRY, but it does not go to result, it's only used during its evaluation. ilovesky What is the format of numbers? [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 4 Mar 2008 18:15 I read this task 13 again... But I don't understand one thing: for example, we have a number ...9898989898989898. This number can be written (98), (89)8 and (98)98. Also (9898) is the same number. As I understand, we can use only (98) in output, but what's about input data? Numbers such (9898) and (999) can not be there, i hope. What do you think about it? Denis Koshman Re: What is the format of numbers? // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 15 Jul 2008 03:50 For my AC solution it does not matter Medium WA31 any tests? [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 7 Nov 2007 00:20 Olympic Bear Re: WA31 any tests? // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 7 May 2008 02:22 check numbers with leading zeroes. It helped me on test 37 Stashuk Alex (Kyiv - Mohyla Academy) WA5 [6] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:19 Who could just give me some tricky test? Vedernikoff Sergey Re: WA5 [5] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:21 (1) (9) ---- (1)0 Stashuk Alex (Kyiv - Mohyla Academy) Re: WA5 [4] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:24 this test passed, but still WA. Edited by author 22.09.2007 21:25 Vedernikoff Sergey Re: WA5 [3] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:28 (999999999) (123456789) ----------- (912345678)8 Stashuk Alex (Kyiv - Mohyla Academy) Re: WA5 // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:30 thanks a lot Vedernikoff Sergey Re: WA5 [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:32 (98765) (12345) ------- (1)0 [SPbSU ITMO] Kazakov Sergey (CK.) Re: WA5 // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 1 May 2008 16:05 (100) (001) Ans: (101) alexutz_mircescu I have passed al the tests from the forums but still WA9!!! help me plzzz [3] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 9 Oct 2007 00:23 : Vedernikoff Sergey Re: I have passed al the tests from the forums but still WA9!!! help me plzzz [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 9 Oct 2007 04:07 (999999999) (000000001) ----------- (100000000)0 (999999999) (999999999) ----------- (9)8 And final hit: (544444444) (555555555) ----------- (100000000)099999999 If your program passes these tests successfully - then you're a unique person :))) marius dumitran Re: I have passed al the tests from the forums but still WA9!!! help me plzzz // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 20 Oct 2007 15:06 they work:) wa on test 6:) Chidori-kun Re: I have passed al the tests from the forums but still WA9!!! help me plzzz // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 24 Oct 2007 21:05 Maybe you don't cut off same parts (this task has many cases)???? Edited by author 31.10.2007 02:44 victor_sch Please, give me some tests. I get WA on test 2. [5] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 14:41 Astrakhan SU Re: Please, give me some tests. I get WA on test 2. [3] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 17:40 What is the 2nd test? Does anybody know????? Gavin Re: Please, give me some tests. I get WA on test 2. [2] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 17:49 I also get WA on test 2 Samsonov Ivan (Rybinsk SAAT) Re: Please, give me some tests. I get WA on test 2. [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 23 Sep 2007 19:04 (00)+(99) (555)+(555) (555)+(544) RusRGB Re: Please, give me some tests. I get WA on test 2. // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 15 Oct 2007 15:41 I've also got WA2. But I was sure that 0.d = d/9 0.dd = dd/99 0.ddd = ddd/999 et al. Isn't it the lot of things to know? alexutz_mircescu Re: Please, give me some tests. I get WA on test 2. // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 18 Oct 2007 19:28 With this tests work, you get AC ;) (999999999) (000000001) ----------- (100000000)0 (999999999) (999999999) ----------- (9)8 And final hit: (544444444) (555555555) ----------- (100000000)099999999 victor_sch wa9 [2] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 17:38 please, help wa on test 9 KIRILL(ArcSTUpid coder:) Re: wa9 // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 18:05 try (99) (09) ---- 90(8) alexutz_mircescu Re: wa9 // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 9 Oct 2007 00:19 i also have wa9 :( Edited by author 09.10.2007 00:20 Edited by author 09.10.2007 00:20 SerailHydra What's the answer for (44)(55)? [2] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 13:45 (0)? or (00)? or (99)? ZuTa Re: What's the answer for (44)(55)? [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 13:47 I think (9)? MINIMUM Samsonov Ivan (Rybinsk SAAT) Re: What's the answer for (44)(55)? // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 23 Sep 2007 19:03 (9) Vitaliy_Ivashchenko what about answers? [1] // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 13:33 Can there be such answer: (9)8 ? SerailHydra Re: what about answers? // Problem 1558. Periodical Numbers 22 Sep 2007 21:07 For the inputs such as (99...9) (99...9) You should always output: (9)8
|