|
|
Show all threads Hide all threads Show all messages Hide all messages | Read carefully the statement | Deepesson | 1844. Warlord of the Army of Mages | 5 Jan 2021 02:06 | 1 | One doesn't have to execute their actions followed by the other. For instance: Sandro can execute 7 consecutive actions and after that Zagamius could execute 20. So basically, their turns don't need to be consecutive. Misinterpretation will lead to WA#4 or WA#5. Edited by author 05.01.2021 02:08 | WA#5 | FreezingCool | 1844. Warlord of the Army of Mages | 31 May 2014 03:14 | 5 | WA#5 FreezingCool 28 Sep 2011 06:36 Could anyone give me some similar test case like test 5? I am having some problems with this one. Also, I have a question about the task. Is this situation possible: +1 +2 -2 -1 +2 -2 +1 -1 My question is pointing at this: After the first moment, first master will call mage 1 (+1) and second master will call mage 2 (+2). In the second moment, is the first master able to call mage 2 since the second master is letting the mage 2 go in the exact same moment? see this 1 6 6 2 + 1 - 1 + 1 + 2 - 1 - 2 + 1 - 1 + 2 + 1 - 1 - 2 answer: :-( My program gives correct answer for that test case but sill WA i can't figure out why. Can you give me other tests? I can't find what's wrong... I used DP, a[i][j] - true - iff Sandro begin i-th step, and Zagamius j-th. little hint: if mag[i] == mag[j] and both are '+' then a[i][j] = false. |
|
|
|