ENG  RUSTimus Online Judge
Online Judge
Задачи
Авторы
Соревнования
О системе
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Новости сайта
Форум
Ссылки
Архив задач
Отправить на проверку
Состояние проверки
Руководство
Регистрация
Исправить данные
Рейтинг авторов
Текущее соревнование
Расписание
Прошедшие соревнования
Правила
вернуться в форум

Обсуждение задачи 1211. Круговая порука

Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+)
Послано Sandro (USU) 27 июн 2007 00:21
The old limitations were 1000 tests in multitest and 25000 childs in one test. There are no more than 16 tests in multitests now. Tests were seriously updated (in fact only Test#1 and Test#2 were not changed). About 300 authors lost their AC after rejudge.
Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+)
Послано Chmel_Tolstiy 27 июн 2007 01:11
Good job. My previous solution was too slow. now I have AC.
Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+)
Послано JTim 27 июн 2007 01:17
I don't understand: my solution on Pascal is wrong now (stack-overflow), but my solution on C is AC as well as before test-updating... I will think about it... Maybe it's need just change stack size...
-------------------------
AC now. Only "{$M 16777216}" corrected my program.
(sorry for my bad english)

Edited by author 27.06.2007 01:31

Edited by author 27.06.2007 01:36
Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+)
Послано Neizvestnii 27 июн 2007 13:05
To JTim: You are right! First I have received Crash stack-overflow on 7 test, then I have added {$M 16777216} in my program and have received AC!
Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+)
Послано Vedernikoff Sergey 28 июн 2007 01:38
Very mysterious rejudge... My first CORRECT and FAST solution now gets WA #1. Or compilers have changed ever since???

Edited by author 28.06.2007 01:39
Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+)
Послано Sandro (USU) 28 июн 2007 14:53
Yes, Pascal compiler has changed since 2004, compiler options in your code are invalid now. Of course, your solution was not the aim of rejudge.