|
|
back to boardAdmins! Please, check test #39! Is it correct? Posted by Valrus 20 Oct 2005 13:14 But.. How to solve this problem? I really want to help you, but... Even i got the correct algorithm to solve it, I still got stuck on case 10.... :( how could i contact you? mine is zhuzeyuan@hotmail.com I think the problem I met is about precision error. To avoid it completely, as far as I got, I must use int128:S... My old source that had WA #39 now gets WA #10! Posted by Valrus 12 Nov 2005 14:09 My e-mail is dimatsu@rambler.ru Re: My old source that had WA #39 now gets WA #10! Test order was changed. Now test 39 is test 10. I updated old statistics. Are you sure that test #10 is correct? Posted by Valrus 12 Nov 2005 15:33 He told me that(+) He is sure the answer is incorrect. your output is better than mine, while mine is better than standard. i am sure i have added a checking part to my program. anyway, i will try to use int128 in the future. Edited by author 18.11.2005 16:10 Program submitted. waiting for his rejudgement.(-) |
|
|