|
|
back to boardGreat problem! Thanks to authors :) Re: Great problem! Posted by svr 30 Nov 2009 10:31 It became such when true claster analysis began or inner structure of each claster is forgotten and clasters are simple poins again. Some time I was tried to trace complicated inner structure but failed. Re: Great problem! is there simpler solution?? I use brute_force search.... Re: Great problem! Yes, O(n^3) solution (maybe can be optimized to O(n^2*log(n)) with nice tree merging) based on MST. Great problem!!! Re: Great problem! Posted by Ade 1 Oct 2023 13:22 yes. love the problem. some tests: 5 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 |
|
|