ENG  RUSTimus Online Judge
Online Judge
Problems
Authors
Online contests
About Online Judge
Frequently asked questions
Site news
Webboard
Links
Problem set
Submit solution
Judge status
Guide
Register
Update your info
Authors ranklist
Current contest
Scheduled contests
Past contests
Rules
back to board

Discussion of Problem 1821. Biathlon

Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Milovanov Maxim 19 Mar 2011 15:50
Give me test 2
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by MOPDOBOPOT (USU) 19 Mar 2011 17:33
3
Masha 91:0.0
Sasha 90:0.0
Vasya 3:0.0

ans:
1
Vasya


Edited by author 20.03.2011 12:37
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Milovanov Maxim 19 Mar 2011 17:39
Thank
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Amrodis 19 Mar 2011 18:11


Edited by author 22.03.2011 02:51
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by daftcoder [Yaroslavl SU] 19 Mar 2011 18:40
Bot not only Vasya?

My AC program says
1
Vasya

==
BTW check test
5
E 1:20.0
D 1:10.0
C 0:30.0
B 0:20.0
A 0.10.0

Ans should be
4
A
B
C
E
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Amrodis 19 Mar 2011 19:02
My solution also says
1
Vasia

and for the BTW check test the same answer.
but i have wa 4.

please give me some other examples.
thanks.
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by MOPDOBOPOT (USU) 20 Mar 2011 12:39
I'm sorry, of course the answer will be
1
Vasya
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by BiteBoy [ONU] 27 Jul 2011 20:46
To daftcoder [Yaroslavl SU]:
Your test has a mistake in the last line. It should be like this:
5
E 1:20.0
D 1:10.0
C 0:30.0
B 0:20.0
A 0:10.0

Edited by author 27.07.2011 20:48
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by daminus 1 Mar 2012 22:22
MOPDOBOPOT (USU) wrote 19 March 2011 17:33
3
Masha 91:0.0
Sasha 90:0.0
Vasya 3:0.0

ans:
1
Vasya


Edited by author 20.03.2011 12:37



It is not TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by ramon93i7 24 Aug 2012 20:28
It's obviously true.
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Furhat 20 Nov 2012 11:56
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Furhat 20 Nov 2012 12:04


Edited by author 20.11.2012 12:16
Re: Why WA 2 ?
Posted by Andros 18 Jun 2014 18:52
MOPDOBOPOT (USU) wrote 19 March 2011 17:33
3
Masha 91:0.0
Sasha 90:0.0
Vasya 3:0.0

But in the statement it says it's in MM:SS.D format, so shouldn't it be 91:00.0, 03:00.0, etc.?