|
|
back to boardWA #3 Posted by Marat 21 Jul 2011 17:35 Give me some tests, please. Re: WA #3 I think the reason for WA3 is in the following test 5 6 4 The evaluator accepts 8 8 7 7 but not 8 8 8 6. Re: WA #3 But why is 8 8 8 6 wrong. The max is still only 8. Re: WA #3 Posted by ucs6 16 Sep 2011 04:33 My program outputs 8 8 8 6 and got AC Re: WA #3 I had the same error. The mistake was in logic. In test 3 3 6 I had 2 2 2 2 1 1 but correct answer is 2 2 2 2 1 0 ,of course. Re: WA #3 I think you are right. but my program which WA#3 output 1 2 1 2 1 2 in test 3 3 6,I think it's right,too.... |
|
|