|
|
| Show all threads Hide all threads Show all messages Hide all messages | | Hint for Tl | Hououin`~`Kyouma | 1844. Warlord of the Army of Mages | 11 Aug 2025 12:45 | 1 | Precalc + don't use set, use bitsets instead | | Hint for WA 2 and 5, that helped me | Hououin`~`Kyouma | 1844. Warlord of the Army of Mages | 11 Aug 2025 12:41 | 1 | "You have to determine whether such a stupid DEFEAT is possible." NOT a victory, but a DEFEAT.
Edited by author 11.08.2025 12:41 | | Read carefully the statement | Deepesson | 1844. Warlord of the Army of Mages | 5 Jan 2021 02:06 | 1 | One doesn't have to execute their actions followed by the other.
For instance:
Sandro can execute 7 consecutive actions and after that Zagamius could execute 20.
So basically, their turns don't need to be consecutive.
Misinterpretation will lead to WA#4 or WA#5.
Edited by author 05.01.2021 02:08 | | WA#5 | FreezingCool | 1844. Warlord of the Army of Mages | 31 May 2014 03:14 | 5 | WA#5 FreezingCool 28 Sep 2011 06:36 Could anyone give me some similar test case like test 5?
I am having some problems with this one.
Also, I have a question about the task.
Is this situation possible:
+1 +2 -2 -1
+2 -2 +1 -1
My question is pointing at this:
After the first moment, first master will call mage 1 (+1) and second master will call mage 2 (+2).
In the second moment, is the first master able to call mage 2 since the second master is letting the mage 2 go in the exact same moment? see this
1
6 6 2
+ 1 - 1 + 1 + 2 - 1 - 2
+ 1 - 1 + 2 + 1 - 1 - 2
answer:
:-( My program gives correct answer for that test case but sill WA i can't figure out why. Can you give me other tests? I can't find what's wrong...
I used DP, a[i][j] - true - iff Sandro begin i-th step, and Zagamius j-th.
little hint: if mag[i] == mag[j] and both are '+' then a[i][j] = false. |
|
|
|
