| ENG RUS | Timus Online Judge |
Discussion of Problem 1453. QueenGorbatykh Michail Runtime error in test 12 // Problem 1453. Queen 14 Mar 2016 02:14 I don't understand, where I made a mistake, but program crushes there everytime, although in my compilator it is works Edited by author 15.03.2016 01:56 wanggp3 WA on test#13 . Can someone help ^ ... ^ // Problem 1453. Queen 30 Jul 2014 00:00 Igor Mihajlovic output size??? [1] // Problem 1453. Queen 21 Aug 2008 05:15 what is the limit for output size it could be very big for n=10000 and s=100000 and if the coordinates is in center of hypercube then there is (s-1)*2^(n-1) by bishop and n*(s-1) by rock squares that queen can move how the hell should i output this?? or am i wrong??? plz help ASAP!!! Edited by author 21.08.2008 07:36 Edited by author 21.08.2008 07:36 Mamuka Sakhelashvili [Freeuni] Re: output size??? // Problem 1453. Queen 11 Dec 2013 21:18 you can use BigInteger class in java, which calculates the numbers of any sizes... hoan test for WA#5 and WA#10 // Problem 1453. Queen 5 Jan 2011 18:26 test1: (for WA#5) input: 1 2 output: 1 test2: (for (WA#10) input: 21 21 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 output: 20971940 hope can help you! quick(YarSU) After Queen 2 it's easy =) // Problem 1453. Queen 21 Jul 2010 19:09 sort + BigInteger Dimke Why WA #5 [3] // Problem 1453. Queen 6 May 2008 19:50 Anyone knows where I can find the tests to this problem? I get WA #5. Vedernikoff Sergey Re: Why WA #5 // Problem 1453. Queen 7 May 2008 04:20 I don't remember exactly, but in this test N=1 or N=2 Nenad Bozidarevic Re: Why WA #5 [1] // Problem 1453. Queen 7 May 2008 16:43 It's because this test case probably has only one dimension, so moving like a bishop counts the same fields as moving like a rook. Denis Koshman Re: Why WA #5 // Problem 1453. Queen 25 Aug 2008 12:59 Good point :) RA Why WA #4 [5] // Problem 1453. Queen 22 Apr 2006 17:00 It's only simple formula and I think it's correct! ACM.Tolstobrov_Anatoliy[Ivanovo SPU] Re: Why WA #4 [2] // Problem 1453. Queen 22 Apr 2006 17:09 I know when formula simple BUT N=10000 And S=100000 It Cool? Somebody can help avoid TLE. boaz Re: Why WA #4 [1] // Problem 1453. Queen 26 Apr 2006 14:07 i got wa 11 Stojcee Re: Why WA #4 // Problem 1453. Queen 5 May 2008 18:53 i made 2 completely different programs and both times i got WA #5, can any1 tell me why ? Aleksa_Markoni Re: Why WA #4 [1] // Problem 1453. Queen 24 May 2008 03:45 Same here can someone tell me what is wrong with that test, i have one version of program that goes to the test 4, then i made some corections and take it to test 8, I corect it again, I am sure that everything is working, but again WA test 4, pls help this is important... Denis Koshman Re: Why WA #4 // Problem 1453. Queen 25 Aug 2008 12:58 WA5 is N=1 case. niktrk WA on test 10 [4] // Problem 1453. Queen 5 May 2008 19:49 What is so special about this test? Vukasin Re: WA on test 10 [3] // Problem 1453. Queen 7 May 2008 14:51 If someone have idea for this test post here Edited by author 07.05.2008 14:52 Stefan Re: WA on test 10 [2] // Problem 1453. Queen 15 May 2008 16:30 Same here! WA on test 10 Zlatko Radojcic Re: WA on test 10 [1] // Problem 1453. Queen 24 May 2008 02:34 Same problem here. I have solution in O(N*S), and it seems ok, but i still get WA#10. Any help would be appreciated, at least idea what could be so diferent in this test. have a nice day Nenad Bozidarevic Re: WA on test 10 // Problem 1453. Queen 24 May 2008 17:13 Generate large input data, and see what the output is. Stefan Special Case [1] // Problem 1453. Queen 15 May 2008 17:21 when dimension=1 and length=x result is x-1! Does anyone know any other special c.? Nenad Bozidarevic Re: Special Case // Problem 1453. Queen 20 May 2008 16:14 Not really... That's the only one where you mustn't take bishop's movement into account, because it covers the same fields the rook does.
|