|
|
вернуться в форумВиктор Крупко said that (*) NO (11(*)) NO (*(**)*) NO Why? Can U explain me this exampleas? Why 'NO'? Thanks. Yeah, I want to get explanation too. the first 2, i don't know. the data thinks that (* should always end with *)....the last "(*(**)//already ended" so "*)" should be deleted Edited by author 16.02.2008 20:26 first: second: it's contradict to /*Комментарий всегда открывается парой символов '(*' и заканчивается парой символов '*)'. */ third: you have '(*' -comment open '(*' '*)' - comment close '*)'- error you can check it in c/c++ if you want;) |
|
|