|  | 
|  | 
| back to board | Anybody get WA#10? Posted by MAI.8  16 Oct 2006 06:05I cann't understand why WA#10. Must I use long double? Please, give me some terrible tests.Re: Anybody get WA#10? I got WA on test 10 too. And it's a little bit strange because the algo is simple. Maybe there are some problems with "10 fractional digits"...Re: Anybody get WA#10? Posted by svr  5 Dec 2006 08:160-result must be established in int64 onlyuse 6 permutations for vertices of aim triangle also
Re: Anybody get WA#10? long double won't help because it's same type as double in VC++
 As for 6 permutations, I think there must be only 3. Otherwise we'll consider flip-overs.
Re: Anybody get WA#10? Posted by alp  14 May 2014 18:03I cann't understand why WA#10. Must I use long double? Please, give me some terrible tests. long double4 is normal. Use EPS = 0.00000001; if use EPS = 0.00000000001 then get WA11. | 
 | 
|