Discussion @ 1211. Collective Guarantee @ Timus Online Judge

Sandro (USU) Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+) [5] // Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee 27 Jun 2007 00:21

The old limitations were 1000 tests in multitest and 25000 childs in one test. There are no more than 16 tests in multitests now. Tests were seriously updated (in fact only Test#1 and Test#2 were not changed). About 300 authors lost their AC after rejudge.

Chmel_Tolstiy Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+) // Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee 27 Jun 2007 01:11

Good job. My previous solution was too slow. now I have AC.

JTim Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+) [1] // Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee 27 Jun 2007 01:17

I don't understand: my solution on Pascal is wrong now (stack-overflow), but my solution on C is AC as well as before test-updating... I will think about it... Maybe it's need just change stack size...
-------------------------
AC now. Only "{$M 16777216}" corrected my program.
(sorry for my bad english)

Edited by author 27.06.2007 01:31

Edited by author 27.06.2007 01:36

Neizvestnii Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+) // Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee 27 Jun 2007 13:05

To JTim: You are right! First I have received Crash stack-overflow on 7 test, then I have added {$M 16777216} in my program and have received AC!

Vedernikoff Sergey Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+) [1] // Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee 28 Jun 2007 01:38

Very mysterious rejudge... My first CORRECT and FAST solution now gets WA #1. Or compilers have changed ever since???

Edited by author 28.06.2007 01:39

Sandro (USU) Re: Changes in the problem 1211 "Collective guarantee" (+) // Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee 28 Jun 2007 14:53

Yes, Pascal compiler has changed since 2004, compiler options in your code are invalid now. Of course, your solution was not the aim of rejudge.

Discussion of Problem 1211. Collective Guarantee