|
|
back to boardMaybe there are weak tests!? Posted by Lomir 1 Jul 2007 04:10 My solution with O(n*x) get AC in 0.171.
However for max test it would have 15000*32000=480 000 000 iterations.
On my not so fast PC(ADM 1800+) it works 1 - 1.3 sec, so i think it wouldn't pass TL of 0.25sec.
The test is:
15000
32000 1
32000 2
32000 3
..........
32000 15000 Re: Maybe there are weak tests!? Posted by svr 1 Jul 2007 10:41 Very good information.
Admins should pay attention on it.
This question about real effectivness of our algorithms.
Edited by author 01.07.2007 10:41
Edited by author 01.07.2007 10:41 Your test was added. Thank you. (-) Re: Your test was added. Thank you. (-) Posted by Lomir 26 Jul 2007 15:53 Nevertheless some other algo with complexivity O(n^2) works well... Re: Your test was added. ... which is quite sad for the ones that spent all eternity, which means about 10 minutes, to write the most straight-forward index tree and produce an N*logN algorithm... Re: Your test was added. 10 minutes are not forever
eternity are days, months, years, centuries, millennia ... |
|
|
