| ENG RUS | Timus Online Judge |
Обсуждение задачи 1571. ПереводчикиPigTree Does everybody know "english"? [13] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 14:50 Lomir Re: Does everybody know "english"? [12] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 15:04 Is the 1st test is a sample one? Can i use any laguage? Than why i got WA then using "MyLanguage"? Algo does the order of printed language is important? russian-english english-german english-french is the same as english-russian english-german english-french or no? victor_sch Re: Does everybody know "english"? [11] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 15:09 It is a mistake in sample output must be russian-french russian-german french-german PigTree Re: Does everybody know "english"? [10] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 15:11 it can pass 1st test victor_sch Re: Does everybody know "english"? [9] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 15:34 i use this but I got wa3 KIRILL(ArcSTUpid coder:) Re: Does everybody know "english"? [8] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 18:08 try 2 a a Lomir Re: Does everybody know "english"? [7] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 21:06 Good test, but now WA6... :( Really, i do not understand why we cant use some intermidiate language what is known only by translators in order to ahieve minimum? Problem's definition must be corrected. Skiminok Re: Does everybody know "english"? [1] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 21:52 We can use any intermediate languages. More exactly - we must use it. Otherwise, you won't pass all the tests. Vedernikoff Sergey Re: Does everybody know "english"? // Задача 1571. Переводчики 6 окт 2007 23:05 1. There is language "english" in 15-th test, so if you always will use "english" - you'll get WA 2. You can use your own languages, but they should correspond to restrictions on length and case Edited by author 06.10.2007 23:05 KIRILL(ArcSTUpid coder:) Re: Does everybody know "english"? [4] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 7 окт 2007 20:05 Lomir писал(a) 6 октября 2007 21:06 Good test, but now WA6... :( Really, i do not understand why we cant use some intermidiate language what is known only by translators in order to ahieve minimum? Problem's definition must be corrected. I also don't understand at all why solution, which out for test 4 a b c d 4 a-b b-c c-d a-d is incorrect Skiminok Re: Does everybody know "english"? [3] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 7 окт 2007 21:21 In your situation, when crews "a" and "c" want to speak each other, they have to use two interpreters: "a-b" and "a-c" (or, may be, "a-d" and "c-d" - it does not matter). But in this case, crew "b" can understand their talk, because language "b" is used in it! AlexF [USTU Frogs] Re: Does everybody know "english"? [2] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 7 окт 2007 21:47 You should always add a language, except special cases with n <= 2. Edited by author 07.10.2007 21:47 KIRILL(ArcSTUpid coder:) Re: Does everybody know "english"? [1] // Задача 1571. Переводчики 7 окт 2007 23:49 yes you're right!) Denis Koshman Re: Does everybody know "english"? // Задача 1571. Переводчики 14 июл 2008 19:43 There are at least 3 cases when N>2 |