ENG  RUSTimus Online Judge
Online Judge
Problems
Authors
Online contests
About Online Judge
Frequently asked questions
Site news
Webboard
Links
Problem set
Submit solution
Judge status
Guide
Register
Update your info
Authors ranklist
Current contest
Scheduled contests
Past contests
Rules
back to board

Discussion of Problem 1718. Rejudge

dibrov4bor[SumySU] When the minimal number of authors is not zero? [12] // Problem 1718. Rejudge 10 Oct 2009 14:43
This is also my question answer plz!
1
Smmam WA 7

Answer: 1 1
so why when it is AC the minimum possible is still 0?

explain clearly plz!!!!
coz that solution may pass a new tests, so minimum possible is 0
If the solution pasts the 6-th case it is not necessary to be wrong.

Edited by author 10.10.2009 15:41

Edited by author 10.10.2009 15:41
as i understood the minimal numbers of autors is not zero, when verdict is WA or ML or TL and the test is 7
Mostafa_angel Re: When the minimal number of authors is not zero? // Problem 1718. Rejudge 10 Oct 2009 16:34
when minimum possible is increased the maximum is increased too !?
smilitude Re: When the minimal number of authors is not zero? [4] // Problem 1718. Rejudge 10 Oct 2009 16:38
If the test is 7 - and if it fails, then obviously the code is wrong, that author won't get any mail for that case.


Edited by author 10.10.2009 16:40
didn't understand. if test 7 fails, new verdict will be fail on 6 test. so it's new verdict
smilitude Re: When the minimal number of authors is not zero? [2] // Problem 1718. Rejudge 10 Oct 2009 16:44
Oh! :O
I think you are right.
Oleg Strekalovsky aka OSt [Vologda SPU] Re: When the minimal number of authors is not zero? [1] // Problem 1718. Rejudge 12 Oct 2009 13:35
User 2 sets : minUsers and maxUsers and be happy
Thanks for the test.

Edited by author 18.12.2011 17:05