|
|
вернуться в форумTo ADMIN: There might be invisible tricks in Test #23. I have run my program on my own conputer (which is slower than the server) several times on the data N = 50000. It takes not more than 0.1 seconds every time. My algo is DP with the Time Complexity O(N). To make my program robust, I use QuickSort to sort the edges, and this might use O(N log N) time. I don't know why I get TLE. Maybe there are some tricks? Thanks in advance. Re: To ADMIN: There might be invisible tricks in Test #23. By the way, I have submitted my program many times, and tried to crash it many times. I realised that test #17 has N = 50000, too. And my program use not more than 0.3 sec to pass it. Why do I get TLE at test #23? Please help me, thx in advance. Edited by author 15.09.2010 12:04 Re: To ADMIN: There might be invisible tricks in Test #23. I have found the problem. The QuickSort procedure in my problem works quite slow in the OJ. I don't know why. First #23 then #25. At last, I use a random method in the QuickSort and get AC, only 0.078 sec. BTW, this is the first time I got stuck in QuickSort in TIMUS. Congratulations... Re: To ADMIN: There might be invisible tricks in Test #23. Послано Ves 17 сен 2010 22:04 > The QuickSort procedure in my problem works quite slow in the OJ. I don't know why. It's not the matter of OJ environment but the matter of corner cases. Note that asymptotic complexity of QuickSort in worst case is O(n*n). Re: To ADMIN: There might be invisible tricks in Test #23. Послано hoan 7 дек 2010 22:16 i dont use quick-sort and use one bfs only, why my program have 0.265 s, in time??? |
|
|