|  | 
|  | 
| back to board | wrong ans in case #3 Code removed
 Edited by author 20.08.2019 21:12
Re: wrong ans in case #3 8*n-7 <--- integer overflowRe: wrong ans in case #3 Integer overflow. But why? And How?
 Edited by author 17.08.2019 19:12
Re: wrong ans in case #3 [code deleted]This code gets wrong answer in case #3.
 
 Edited by author 18.08.2019 20:49
 
 Edited by author 18.08.2019 20:49
 
 Edited by moderator 17.11.2019 18:48
Re: wrong ans in case #3 On timus 'long int' is equal to 'int', to use 64-bit integers you need to write 'long long'.Also, there is a precision error in your 'per_sq' function. This line:
 return ((x-floor(x))?0:1);
 must be written as
 return (abs(x-floor(x)) > 1e-8 ? 0 : 1);
Re: wrong ans in case #3 Thanks. I didn't know about the bit size of long in Timus. And what you said about the function. I had problem in the argument. I used double instead of int then it got accepted. | 
 | 
|