|
|
вернуться в форумWhy should I got WA2? It seems very easy to solve. Послано z 27 май 2004 18:12 {$N+} Program Mars_satellites; Var cos_,x,a,b,c,d:Double; Begin Readln(a,b,c,d); If (a*b-c*d)=0 Then Begin Write('Impossible'); End Else Begin cos_:=a*a+b*b-c*c-d*d; cos_:=cos_/(2*a*b-2*c*d); x:=a*a+b*b-2*a*b*cos_; x:=sqrt(x); x:=round(1000*x); Write('Distance is ',x:0:0,' km.'); End; End. Re: Why should I got WA2? It seems very easy to solve. Hi, your program has two mistakes, first one is (a*b-c*d)=0, equlity cannot be tested with doubles that way, you should use Abs(a*b-c*d)<e instead, where e is very small value, in this case e=0.01 is enough; second mistake is the formula I think, try to solve the math part of this problem again. If you want I can send you my AC program ( or just it's formula ). HO-HO-HO ...то выведите "Impossible.", иначе... "Impossible{.}" Re: Why should I got WA2? It seems very easy to solve. who said the numbers were double? they are small integers... And the formula is very good... Re: Why should I got WA2? It seems very easy to solve. Послано ivan 7 апр 2012 23:45 working formula =) nice |
|
|