What is test #15??

Are you sure you really mean "subsequence" and not "substring"?

#include <iostream>
#include <cstdio>

using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    int n, t;
    double *gandolas, *res;
    double s;
    cin >> n >> t >> s;
    gandolas = new double[n];
    res = new double[n];
    for(int i=0; i<n; i++)cin >> gandolas[i];

    for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
        if(i==0)
            if(gandolas[i] >= s){
                res[i] = s + (t-(gandolas[i] - s))/2;
                s = res[i];
            }
            else{
                res[i] = s + (t-(s - gandolas[i]))/2;
                s = res[i];
            }
        else{
            res[i] = s + (gandolas[i] - gandolas[i-1])/2;
            s = res[i];
        }
    }
    for(int i=0; i<n; i++)printf("%.6lf\n", res[i]);
    return 0;
}

can't imagine a test that make it crash

I got AC, but my program on the input data
10 9
Throws 13, although the correct answer 12.

Edited by author 22.09.2014 17:03

What can be wrong? Did you have such result?

My code:

/*
Code deleted.
*/

we get the WA12.

What's the problem?

Edited by author 09.11.2013 22:57

31 байт ни кто короче уже не сделает

кто короче?

Can anybody help me??? Please...

зашол на тимус попытался отправить задачу
такой ид не сушкствует
востановил аккаут посредством е-mail но уже совсем другой ид и не одной решённой задачи из тех которых я решал помогите

Edited by author 03.11.2013 19:20

что стало с этим идом 122878EJ ?
( http://acm.timus.ru/author.aspx?id=122878 )
помогите востаовить

My program outputs the following on test 1:

0
1
9
3
4
4
4
4
4
1

and I get WA1. However if I use G++ 2011 on the same code then I pass test 1 and get TLA on test 8.

Help please. give please test #22. I can't Imagine what can be wrong in my programm

how about the test4???

Edited by author 01.07.2009 09:47

But you can't, so here is a meaningless post. Originally it was about not understanding the sample because for some reason I thought there were four stripies, one of them weight 3. I sat for 20 minutes trying to figure out why the sample was correct. :)

Edited by author 29.06.2013 16:13